[quote=“Ken Lenard”][quote=“sl8w”]I’m a little late to this discussion, but I’ll add my comments anyway.
I agree with Shadetree and others who say that saison and belgian yeasts are not appropriate in a BDG. Well, “appropriate” may not be the right word. Let’s just say that, in my opinion, BDGs should be made with other yeasts. Like 1007, as was suggested earlier, or maybe even WL515 Antwerp Ale. Or WL072, which I have never used but which I understand doesn’t have much of the belgiany or saisony characteristics. Or even a warm fermented lager yeast. I don’t know if they still do, but this host used to sell a BDG kit with the Wyeast 2112 Cali lager yeast.
Linguistically, “guarde” means to age or put away (or something like that). I don’t know how true this actually is, but I like to think that back in the olden days a BDG was a malty-ish beer, made with french ingredients (grains, hops, etc.) that was put in the cellar like a french wine so that it took on a cellaring, aged terroir. I think that this is probably the most defining characteristic of the style, but also the hardest to duplicate in a homebrew.
I’ve tried several attempts at making a BDG. I’ve done the Northern Brewer kit with 2112. I’ve tried my own recipes with 1007, and with warm fermented lager yeast (IIRC, 2124 at about 58F). And yes, even though I say it isn’t appropriate, I’ll admit that I’ve even tried it with saison yeast. I liked the saison versions the least. I didn’t enter every single BDG in competition, but I will also admit that my highest scoring BDG was actually one where I blended about 80% Dunkel and 20% saison, then entered it as a BDG. I didn’t set out to brew a BDG that time, but the blend seemed to work as a BDG so I entered it to see what judge’s comments I would get.
Hope this helps.[/quote]
Good stuff there, thank you. This beer is still on my radar and the recipe I put together has been printed out and is sitting about 2 feet from me right now. I wanted there to be a good amount of information to sift through before I made a decision so I appreciate any and all responses in this thread. My current strategy is to wait until WLP072 is released and use that because it seems like the yeast that will work the best in this style for me. When I was a new(er) brewer, I used any and all yeasts without regard for my tastebuds and I made a lot of beer that I did not think was good… mostly because of the choice of yeast. I kept good notes on what yeast strains I like and which ones I do not and I admit that my brewing (and the yeasts I choose) has been in sort of a box because I stick with what I like. I use a lot of 1056, 1272, 1764, 1028, 1099, 1968 for ales and I have my stable of lager yeasts which I know well. But this is one reason I wanted to make this beer and get outside my box a little bit. But… I don’t want to get so far outside my box that it results in pouring 5 gallons down the drain. I have this WLP011 Euro ale yeast now but so many brewers have winced and made a face when I mention it… I don’t think I want to risk it. I was talking to one brewing buddy recently and when I mentioned WLP011, he gave me something like this…
:lol: [/quote]
Bad news for me. But then again some people love the “Belgiany flavors” that I can’t choke own let alone enjoy. I have a vial of wlp011 I planned on using for my next beer. Did they say anything particular about it? I read good things and it seemed to fit based on descriptions of what I wanted.