So my wife (Irish, likes beer, scotch and wine, and enjoys brewing) wants to buy me a conical fermenator for my birthday. Since I don’t have room for a fridge big enough to put it in I was thinking of going with the morebeer 7.5g with the temp controller. I was wondering if anyone has used this or any type of conical and what you think? Is it worth it? Better beer? Less oxidation/infection? Any cons?
I’ve got the 14gal and LOVE it. Set the temp and you don’t have to worry about ferm temps. Dumping is a breeze as well. Best part… you can cold crash it in the conical making that a breeze as well.
I’ve been trying to convince my wife to let me buy a 7.5gal for my small batches…
The only thing a conical allows that every other vessel doesn’t is the ability to dump yeast and trub with the vessel full, nothing more. If you spend the $$ to get one with temp control on it, the temp control is definitely a big thing that helps make better beer, but a fridge and a temp controller costs a lot less and can hold any other vessel and be used for other things.
A small conical fermenter is not going to make your beer better, it’s just a tool in a process. There are a lot more cheap process changes that will improve the beer
I tend to agree with Dean. Dollar-wise, you get a lot more cooling potential with a chest freezer and external thermostat than you do with a conical, though it would be nice…
I just can’t see the cost being worth it. I would rather get two chest freezers, so I could put one for fermenting and the other for long lagering near freezing, or one for ales and one for lagers…or maybe three - one for ales, and one for lagers and one converted to a keezer…no wait, four - one for lagering near freezing, one for lager fermenting, one for ale fermenting, one for a keezer.
Yeah, maybe just go with the jacketed conical fermenter, since your wife has approved it.
I love my Brewhemoth 22gal fermentor, perfect for 10-15gal batches. I ferment under pressure and transfer to kegs without the beer ever seeing oxygen. I don’t yet have temp control for it, been shopping for a freezer it will fit in.
Other than cost, the only cons with conicals is cleaning and thats not insurmountable.
I understand the concept behind a conical, (re: dump the trub and sediment), but how does THAT happen?
Open the bottom valve at a trickle, one big shot, etc…?
They sure are neat, and if …, if… it were me, I’d invest in more chiller / fermenter / temp controlled storage :cheers: .
[quote=“Dean Palmer”]The only thing a conical allows that every other vessel doesn’t is the ability to dump yeast and trub with the vessel full, nothing more. If you spend the $$ to get one with temp control on it, the temp control is definitely a big thing that helps make better beer, but a fridge and a temp controller costs a lot less and can hold any other vessel and be used for other things.
A small conical fermenter is not going to make your beer better, it’s just a tool in a process. There are a lot more cheap process changes that will improve the beer [/quote]
The stainless has an advantage over plastic when it comes to sanitation.
I agree with a lot that has been said here already. I wouldn’t get a conical until I was doing larger batches (I’m doing 20gal right now). If you don’t have a counterflow chiller or kegging setup go for that instead.
When you dump yeast it comes squirting out of the valve. I have triclamps and I catch yeast in a clean quart jar.
Stainless plus valves is a very handy combo. I che ked out morebeers temp controlled conical and I would worry about cleaning. I prefer to have stainless surface and be ad to move it out of a fridge for cleaning.
No room for fridge. That’s the problem. She lets me use spare bathroom for beer cave. That’s why I think that the temp controlled conical might work best if she springs for it.
$1795.00 is pretty insane for a single dedicated vessel. Find room for a fridge big enough to fit a fermenter and be done with it. NB sells a nice Blichmann conical, and Craigslist or local classifieds are a great place to find a cheap fridge.