[quote=“mattnaik”]I’ve made a couple disappointing brews and a few of them were back to back. One of them was a Weizenbock that was disgustingly sweet (1.030 FG). I actually let it age about 6 months hoping it would come around and flavors would do something favorable and it didn’t so I just finished dumping that a few weeks ago. I had another DIPA I tried to brew (my 3rd ever extract brew) almost a year ago that I should have added another 1lb of sugar to cause it was also terribly sweet. I’m cellaring this now and hoping it will make a decent barleywine but I’m not holding my breath.
Most of my sub par brews came from recipe experimentation. While they are good lessons, they are very time consuming, costly, and disappointing lessons. They can definitely take the wind out of your sails. Nothing sucks more than spending all that time doing research and throwing together a recipe, spending the better part of a Sunday, waiting 6+ weeks only to find out your idea sucked.
This is why I would second what others are saying and stick with kits or well established recipes and make your experiments like every 3rd brew. This is what I started doing. I just brewed a self-designed recipe yesterday so here’s to hoping this one turns out good![/quote]
BREW SIMPLE…IMO no one should be brewing RIS and DIPA or whatever on their 3rd beer. I have never tasted a beer someone made (during rookie brewing) when they wanted to do some some crazy high OG, over hopped, over oaked, to many ingredients
I do not know why everyone wants to brew crazy stuff but they do and usually ruin it.
Stick to simple stuff keep your OG under 1.055 or so, hone in on your process, dont make recipes with ingredients you do not know the outcome, or test those ingredients before you use them, recipe formulation is fairly simple it needs to be kept simple to. Brewing the beer right is the tough part.
Want a challenge to hone in your process?
Take a simple recipe (SMASH)
Make it over and over again until it always tastes the same.
9lbs 2Row
2oz of one hop
US05